Twentieth Sunday after Trinity, 2009
Series: Duties of the Laity in the ACNA, Part 6
The Rev. Jerry Kistler
St. Stephen’s Reformed Episcopal Church
A frail black woman stands slowly to her feet. She is something over 70 years of
age. Facing her from across the room are several white police officers, one of whom, a
Mr. Van der Broek, has just
been tried and found guilty in the murders of both the woman's son and her husband some years
before.
It was
established that Mr. Van der Broek
had come to the woman's home, taken her only child, shot him at point -blank
range and then burned the young man's body in a fire while he and the other
officers partied nearby.
Several years later, Van der Broek and his cohorts returned to take away her husband as well. For many months she
heard nothing of his whereabouts. Then, almost two years after her husband's
disappearance, the hate-filled Van der Broek came back to abduct the woman herself. How vividly she
remembers that evening, going to a place beside a river where she was shown her
husband, bound and beaten, but
still strong in spirit, lying on a pile of wood. The last words she heard from
his swollen lips as the officers poured gasoline over his body and set him
aflame were, "Father, forgive them..."
And now the elderly widow stands in the courtroom and listens to the
confession offered by Mr. Van der Broek.
A member of
"I want three things," begins the old woman, calmly, but confidently. "I want first to be taken to
the place where my husband's body was burned so that I can gather up the dust
and give his remains a decent burial." She pauses, then
continues. "My husband and
son were my only family. I want, secondly, therefore, for Mr. Van der
Broek to become my adopted son. I would like for him
to come twice a month to the ghetto and spend a day with me, so that I can pour
out on him whatever love I still have remaining within me, for the rest of my
years."
"And,
finally," she says with tears welling in her eyes, "I want a third
thing. I would like Mr. Van der Broek to know that I offer
him my forgiveness because Jesus
Christ died to forgive. This was also the wish of my husband. And so I would kindly ask someone to come to my side and
lead me across the courtroom so that I can take Mr. Van der
Broek in my arms, embrace him, and let him know that
he is truly forgiven." As the court assistants come to lead the elderly woman across the room, Mr. van der
Broek, overwhelmed by what he has just heard, faints.
And as he does, those in the courtroom, friends, family, neighbors -all victims of decades of oppression and
injustice--begin to sing softly, but assuredly, "Amazing grace, how sweet
the sound, that saved a wretch like me....” (based on
a story posted on www.present-truth.org).
What courageous forgiveness! It’s the kind of
forgiveness the world just can’t understand. The world looks at such
forgiveness as not only reckless and foolish, but as boarding on insanity. Who
in their right mind could ever forgive, much less adopt, such a monster who
terrorized and destroyed her whole family, burning her husband to death before
her own eyes? In such a case isn’t a person just not to forgive? Sometimes even we Christians identify better with a
person like the wife of a slain police officer who also got her chance to stand
at the end of the trial process and confront her husband’s murder, but said, “I
don’t forgive you. I will never forgive you. And I will be there
when you die, just like you were there when my husband died. I will never
forgive you.” Put in that situation it’s hard to know how any of us would respond.
But
if Jesus taught us anything it is that we should love our enemies; that we
should bless those who curse us, do good to those who hate us, pray for those
who spitefully use us and persecute us, that we might be the sons and daughter
of our Father in heaven, for He does the same. But Jesus didn’t just teach us
these things; He lived them, and He died practicing what He preached. As the
man in the flames reminded his wife, Jesus chose to expend some of the last of
his tormented breath pleading on behalf of his tormentors that His Father would
forgive them, for they knew not what they did.
The sixth of the ten duties
the Anglican Church in
Now this is a duty that we
all know is part and parcel of our acceptance of the Gospel. Jesus taught that
if we would receive forgiveness, we must practice forgiveness. “Forgive us our
trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.” And He went on to say,
“For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also
forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your
Father forgive your trespasses” (Mt.
But this is just what we do.
Somehow or other we believe that God should be able to forgive us with just the
slightest acknowledgement of our sins on our parts, but it someone should sin
against us, they damn well better grovel on their knees and writhe on the
ground before we forgive them. Or we think that if God should be able to
instantly forgive and forget our sins, casting them away from us as far as the
east is from the west, we ought to be able to hold on to offenses against us for
a little while, and maybe even bring them out at a opportune moment in the
future. Don’t we do that?
But Jesus taught a little
parable on just this issue, didn’t He? We call it the Parable of the Unforgiving
Servant. We’ll be going through that parable in a couple of weeks in our Sunday
school class, so I won’t go into all the details now. But you know the story. A
man owed a certain king 10, 000 talents – a sum equivalent to 60 million days
wages, more than all the gold contained in Solomon’s temple, which was right
around 8000 talents. And so of course the man was not able to pay what he owed.
The point Jesus is making is that our debt of sin to God is just like this
man’s unpayable debt to the king. But the king was moved with compassion for
the man, and released him, and forgave him all the debt, simply because the man
asked him – not because he had sufficiently groveled or suffered enough to earn
the king’s forgiveness, but simply because the king had pity on him. But you
know what happened next. The man went out and found someone who owed him a
hundred denarii
– a pittance in comparison to what he owed the king - and had him thrown into
debtors’ prison until he paid back every last cent. But then the king found out
about. And when he called the man back into his presence he said, “You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt because you
begged me. Should you not also have had compassion on your fellow servant, just
as I had pity on you?” And he handed the man over to the torturers till he
should pay back all that he owed. And Jesus concludes His parable with some of
the most sober words He ever spoke: “So My heavenly Father will do to you if
each of you, from his heart, does not forgive his brother” (Matt.
But how do we do
forgiveness? What is the process? What
are the ways we go about forgiving one another our offences? Well, Jesus gives
us two options, and only two options.
We may first choose to forgive unilaterally – that means, one-sidedly, without any
efforts or deserving on the side of the offending person. That’s the way the
king forgave his servant. That’s the way the elderly woman in
The second option is the
option of confrontation – the option of going to the person who has sinned
against you, telling him of his sin, and calling for his repentance. On another
occasion Jesus said, “Take heed to yourselves. If a brother sins against you,
rebuke him; and if he repents, forgive him.” But He didn’t stop there. He said,
“And if he sins against you seven times in a day, and seven times in a day
returns to you, saying, “I repent,’ you shall forgive him” (Lk.
17:3-4).
We have to pause and ask
first of all, Who would ever do such a thing? Who
would ever sin the same sin seven times in a day against the same person? Well,
how about you for starters? How many times have you sinned the same sin against
God and gone back and asked His forgiveness, and then turned right around and
committed it again, and then came back and asked for forgiveness again? And how
many times has your heavenly Father forgiven you? Every time! So until you can stop
being a habitual sinner, you must practice habitual forgiveness.
But if you choose this second
option – the option of confrontation – if you choose it all the time, let me tell you this: you will be wearing yourself
out, and you will wear out everyone around you. And it will be apparent to
everyone, except maybe yourself, that you aren’t
forgiving, that what you looking for is payment, reparations, penance paid to
you before you’re willing to forgive.
But you see the problem with that is that’s not the way you heavenly
Father forgave you. You see, the key principle in the Scriptures is that you are
to be forgiving of others “even as God in Christ forgave you” (Eph.
So when should you choose the second option – the option of confrontation? When the offense is such a barrier to the relationship that there cannot
be peace without confronting it and working towards reconciliation. But
that ought to be the goal of any confrontation: reconciliation, not telling the
other person what we think of them; not rubbing their noses in their sin; not making
them pay penance for their sins, but seeking reconciliation.
These are the two options
Christ has given us: unilateral forgiveness, or confrontation for the purpose
of reconciliation. He did not give us a third. He did not give us the option of
holding a grudge. He did not give us the option of broadcasting our issues with
a person to everybody we know except
that person. As a matter of fact, in Matthew chapter 18 He said if we want to
go the way of confrontation we are to go to the person who offended us, and to
him alone, and tell him of his fault. And if he repents, Jesus says, we’ve won
our brother. And nobody else has to know there was ever a problem. If he
doesn’t repent we’re to take one or two others with us as witnesses and
confront him again. And if he repents, great! Again we’ve won our brother. If he doesn’t repent, then and only then are we to bring it to the
church. And then if he doesn’t repent, we’re to treat him as heathen and
a tax collector. We may not skip steps one and two and go straight to the end
of the process. And if we’re not willing to take it to the end of the process,
then the only option left to us is to forgive unilaterally. We may not choose
to hang on to the offense.
This is the way things are
supposed to work in the Church. We are to practice forgiveness daily according
to our Lord’s teaching. And that means we are to practice it in one of only two
ways: to forgiven unilaterally without any earning or deserving on the other’s
part, or to confront for the purpose of bring the person to repentance so there
can be reconciliation.
So let us strive with
everything in our being to forgive as we have been forgiven, for this is the
responsibility laid upon us by our acceptance of the gospel. “Lord, forgive us
our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us.” +